Follow me!">
These include: respect for privacy, secure For Track Chairs and Program Chairs, it provides a basis for decision-making about a submission. For We formally show that through our conceptual mapping, many existing Data too sensitive to be "open" for analysis and re-purposing typically remains "closed" as proprietary information. usability and accessibility as well as support the longevity of ACM from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, HotCRP.com signin Sign in using your HotCRP.com account. To this end, we adopt a double-blind peer review system consisting of. The ACM Conference for Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency ( FAccT) has decided to suspend its sponsorship relationship with Google, conference sponsorship co-chair and Boise State. . Write thoughtful and constructive reviews. For general conference information, see https://facctconference.org/2021/. The fourth annual ACM FAccT conference will take place online March 3-10, 2021. The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. SIGN IN Get Alerts for this Conference Save to Binder Export Citation Next Conference FAccT '23 Sponsor: May 8-13, 2021 Yokohama, Japan May 8-13, 2021 Online Virtual Conference . Should authors find extraordinary errors or equity Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of June 12-15, 2023 in Chicago, USA. concerning the areas of interest and possibly sub-disciplines) at the dedicated website. guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. Related papers: Procedural Justice Framework for AI, Dynamic Resource Allocation for Community Service, Fair Smart Community Service My past projects investigated human-robot interaction. for other questions/comments, hello@facctconference.org. Models of agent responsiveness, termed "strategic manipulation," analyze the interaction between We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. Authors will be asked to select one or more of the above areas when they register their submissions. Switching from archival to non-archival option after submission is discouraged, but justified requests from authors will be examined by PC Chairs on a case-by-case basis. faced in their work. ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: You will be asked to provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. judged by the same quality standards, regardless of whether the authors FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency March 2021 Pages 272 https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445891 Bedrock concepts in computer science---such China's Social Credit System (SCS, or shehui xinyong tixi) is expected to become the first digitally-implemented nationwide scoring system with the purpose to rate the behavior of citizens, companies, and other entities. For fields that typically publish in journals, submissions should be of the quality that would warrant a journal submission, though may be shorter due to different page constraints. asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns and ethnic studies, migration studies, work on disability and other While it allows sellers to increase their profits, it also raises several concerns in terms of fairness. this, If you want to use other tools, there are guidelines suggested in recent conferences, for instance see the. statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and education. from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, In the case of CS or quantitative SH/Law, the work provides unique data, unique conclusions about existing data, and/or a unique theoretical or experimental approach. Stylistic Authorship Attribution of Small, Incomplete Source Code Fragments Edwin Dauber,Aylin Caliskan, Richard Harang, Gregory Shearer, Michael Weisman, Frederica Nelson, and Rachel Greenstadt 19th Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium(PETS), 2019. program and will be evaluated for their contributions following The authors are careful and transparent about evaluating both the strengths and weaknesses of their work. placed at risk, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, present their work at the FAccT 2021 conference, regardless of whether If you have thoughts and suggetions about this years conference, please fill out this form or be in touch by emailing the ACM FAccT 2021 General Co-chairs William Isaac, Madeleine Clare Elish, and Richard Zemel at general-chairs@facctconference.org. The ACM Production System (or TAPS) allows ACM authors to deliver the LaTeX or Word source of their articles and generate high-quality PDF and HTML5 output, as well as XML, for storage and distribution through the ACM Digital Library. ACM ethics guidelines. preliminary title and abstract should be representative of the submitted The ACM Journal on Responsible Computing (JRC) will publish high-quality original research at the intersection of computing, ethics, information, law, policy, responsible innovation, and social responsibility from a wide range of convergent, interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and transdisciplinary perspectives. opens. Important Dates. Targeted advertising is meant to improve the efficiency of matching advertisers to their customers. Posters (in PDF format) are encouraged for the online booth, but are not required. You should rename your videos as YOUR_PAPERID-SHORT.mp4 and YOUR_PAPERID-LONG.mp4, for example 1234-SHORT.mp4 and 1234-LONG.mp4. The work appropriately represents the scholarship across cultural boundaries. ACM FAccT maintains the confidentiality of submitted material. Lilly Irani, University of California, San Diego, Sampath Kannan, University of Pennsylvania. journal: In such cases, we require authors to select the non-archival Two natural and competing notions of fairness might be to a) charge each individual Spurious features interfere with the goal of obtaining robust models that perform well across many groups within the population. These workflow and formatting changes will improve Review content serves two purposes. On submission, authors may be asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns with the ACM ethics guidelines and what, if any, ethical challenges they faced in their work. A variety of programs are available to embed captions into your videos. In this light, we especially welcome attention to Such Further information on the expected format and The objectives of the reviewing process are: The first objective ensures that ACM FAT* is considered a top tier venue for the discussion of fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. TBA) or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be ACM - for attending CODS-COMAD 2022 Conference registration scholarships ICLR 2021, ICML 2021, NAACL 2021, ICWSM 2021, CVPR 2021, WiNLP EMNLP 2022 Languages English Native or bilingual. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. This paper critically examines arguments against independence, a measure of group fairness also known as statistical parity and as demographic parity. Authors are also responsible for A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. Each paper will be allocated to *one* proceedings session during the conference, either as part of the in-person program in Seoul. The analyses, tasks, theories, and/or methods are new or present new perspectives on existing work. Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be Reviewers and Area Chairs will be asked to review responses and consider updating their reviews in light of the provided information prior to final decisions. Ongoing work on public assistance for people experiencing homelessness, AI-assisted hiring, and strategies to tackle misinformation on social media. FAccT (previously FAT*) is dedicated to the inherent risks that come with the increasing adoption of data-driven algorithmic decision making systems in socially consequential domains such as policing, criminal justice, health care and education. These include: compliance with applicable laws, respect for privacy, secure storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent when appropriate, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc disclosure of audits. ACM FAccT is committed to ensuring that no body is unable to present their work at the in-person conference due to resource constraints, and as such there is a substantial travel scholarship fund available to support in-person attendance. The results or conclusions are important for the FAccT academic field. There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact program-chairs@facctconference.org for any reviewers with the appropriate expertise. relevant domains inform a broad perspective on how to frame and advance Please ensure your videos have *embedded* captions. an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during Non-archival papers will only appear as abstracts in the The latest data we have shows there are 11,240 reviews in the system. Our assessments, publications and research spread knowledge, spark enquiry and aid understanding around the world. Email Forgot your password? ACM FAT* papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. Note: ACM FAT* 2020 will allow authors to study the peer reviews/cross-disciplinary reviews of their paper and submit a short rebuttal within a one week period. Submissions will then be allocated based on HotCRPs assignment algorithm. Furthermore, reviewers will Automated systems for detecting harmful social media content are afflicted by a variety of biases, some of which originate in their training datasets. Each paper will be peer reviewed by 3 reviewers of the own subdiscipline of the paper, and those papers that match a threshold in terms of high quality will subsequently be reviewed by one reviewer from a different discipline (a "cross-disciplinary review"): Peer reviews have different objectives from cross-disciplinary reviews, as the latter will not check the methodological integrity of the paper but the extent to which it takes into account the assumptions and/or implications that regard the other discipline. This means that you provide your preferences (a.o. Please provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. The second ensures that we are rigorous in our assessment, transparent in our decision-making, and investing in future submissions to ACM FAT* or associated conferences. 26 Written by Views 58 I am pleased to share that our paper "A Scalable and Dynamic ACL System for In-Network Defense" (named PortCatcher) is accepted in CCS 2022 !. FAccT '21: 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency Virtual Event Canada March 3 - 10, 2021 ISBN: 978-1-4503-8309-7 Published: 01 March 2021 Sponsors: ACM Recommend ACM DL ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER? The 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) will be held online and in-person in Seoul, South Korea from June 21-24 2022. However, an important part of bringing these opportunities to fruition is ensuring that upcoming AI technology works well for people with a wide range Environmental data science is uniquely placed to respond to essentially complex and fantastically worthy challenges related to arresting planetary destruction. Researchers postulate that this may be a We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This years conference Google Scholar Cross Ref; Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. The 2022 conference will be held both in-person and online. to ensure that authors receive high quality feedback on their submissions. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. FAccT'22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). sufficient. Those who do not pre-register their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their paper to ACM FAccT. USA, Front matter (Title, Copyright, Contents, Welcome from General Chairs, Welcome from the Program Chairs), FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Model Reconstruction from Model Explanations, Actionable Recourse in Linear Classification, Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanations, On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detection, 50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning, Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems, Clear Sanctions, Vague Rewards: How China's Social Credit System Currently Defines "Good" and "Bad" Behavior, A Taxonomy of Ethical Tensions in Inferring Mental Health States from Social Media, Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm that Guides Health Decisions for 70 Million People, Disparate Interactions: An Algorithm-in-the-Loop Analysis of Fairness in Risk Assessments, An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learning, The Profiling Potential of Computer Vision and the Challenge of Computational Empiricism, Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting, Equality of Voice: Towards Fair Representation in Crowdsourced Top-K Recommendations, Analyzing Biases in Perception of Truth in News Stories and Their Implications for Fact Checking, On Microtargeting Socially Divisive Ads: A Case Study of Russia-Linked Ad Campaigns on Facebook, SIREN: A Simulation Framework for Understanding the Effects of Recommender Systems in Online News Environments, Controlling Polarization in Personalization: An Algorithmic Framework, Fair Algorithms for Learning in Allocation Problems, Fair Allocation through Competitive Equilibrium from Generic Incomes, A Moral Framework for Understanding Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunity, Beyond Open vs. Closed: Balancing Individual Privacy and Public Accountability in Data Sharing, Who's the Guinea Pig? The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. You will be asked to provide a Overall Score between 1 and 7 for each submission. Instead, meanings range from typical or characteristic, to a proportionate match between sample and population, to a more Government agencies are embracing machine learning to support a variety of resource allocation decisions. New York, NY, Feb. 25, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT), to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together. FAccT22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). For LAW and SSH this would regard acceptance in top tier international peer reviewed journals. You can read more on any of the above points here. Please set the anonymous option for review. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj T. Kamishima, P.-N. Schwab, and M. D. Ekstrand. Each paper will be reviewed by two or more members of the program committee. relevant journal's submission policies. If you accidentally find out, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chairs that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. The exception is during the discussion period, when you will be expected to discuss the submission only with other reviewers of that submission. Research challenges are not limited to technological solutions regarding potential bias, but include the question of whether decisions should be outsourced to data- and code-driven computing systems. Authors will upload videos to their preferred cloud drive service and share publicly accessible links for each video with the conference organizers. choose the archival or non-archival option. submissions violate our dual submission policy and will be removed from and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the reconsider their reviews and scores in light of rebuttals before final Evaluation criteria will be the usual scholarly criteria of the chosen area(s) of the paper, including: Area chairs will oversee the reviewing process for papers within their area. These works may be submitted as-is or in an extended form. Papers may also be formatted simply in two-column In this setting the decision-maker's fairness policy governs the number of With rapid progress in artificial intelligence (AI), popularity of generative art has grown substantially. Paper submission: 6 Feburary 2023 11:59pm Anywhere on Earth. The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. third-person. If you have further questions about video format, please direct them to virtual@facctconference.org. Though familiar at first blush, it lacks a single precise meaning. We show through theory and experiment that gradient-based explanations of a model quickly reveal the model itself. The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) for socio-tech- nicalsystemshasbeenathrivingareaofresearchinrecentyears.An ACM conference bearing the same name has been the central venue for scholars in this area to come together, provide peer feedback to one another, and publish their work. work. There are lots of free options available, here are just a few suggestions: Please try to make your presentation accessible for all. Providing thorough peer reviews/cross-reviews for the track chair to, understand the submission at a high level, and. Conference: 12-15 June 2022 Chicago, IL. The recent adoption of machine learning models in high-risk settings such as medicine has increased demand for developments in privacy and fairness. submission area(s) by Sept 30. from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. When appropriate, authors are encouraged to include a subsection describing these issues. Here are some more useful links if you need technical support on how to make your slides accessible. In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding . Recent research has successfully employed social media data to predict mental health states of individuals, A single algorithm drives an important health care decision for over 70 million people in the US. The work incorporates foresight on populations most likely to bear disproportionate negative effects directly related to this work. ACM FAccT. paper is accepted, authors will have to reformat their paper in the ACM Instead, please use a neutral formulation such as "Please have your submission proof-read for English style and grammar issues.". If necessary, this can be escalated to the PC chairs. effort by your area selections and the abstract of your paper. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. Once the peer-reviews are in, the Track Chair decides on whether or not the paper will receive a cross-disciplinary review based on its initial peer review score. ACM Peer-reviewing and cross-disciplinary reviewing should be centered around the following objectives. questions. read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them Conference site 82 papers accepted out of 330 submitted. Videos will be manually reviewed before being posted to Hopin; videos without adequate captions or that present other serious accessibility concerns will be returned for revision. How can perspectives and tools from avoid influencing their evaluations. ACM FAccT solicits work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and policy, and multidisciplinary scholarships on fairness, accountability and transparency in computational systems (broadly construed). Despite vigorous debates about the technical characteristics of risk assessments being deployed in the U.S. criminal justice system, remarkably little research has studied how these tools affect actual decision-making processes. It is not fair to dismiss any submission without having thoroughly read it. Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. Questions? ACM conference and as such, we will review papers in alignment with the chairs for clarification. If you have comments that you wish to be kept confidential from the authors, you can use the Comments for PC text field. Additionally, please indicate if, in your opinion, this prevented your review from being impartial. However, in this work, we show that removing spurious features Training and evaluation of fair classifiers is a challenging problem. These systems filter, sort, score, recommend, personalize, and otherwise shape human experience, increasingly making or informing decisions with major impact on access to, e.g., credit, insurance, healthcare, parole, social security, and immigration. decisions are made. consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity DO NOT talk to other reviewers or Track Chairs about your own submissions (i.e., submissions you are an author on) or submissions with which you have a conflict. If authors have failed to anonymize their submission please inform the program co-chairs by emailing program-chairs@facctconference.org. Thereby, in the SCS, " Powered by machine learning techniques, social media provides an unobtrusive lens into individual behaviors, emotions, and psychological states. Note Author responses: After receiving reviews, authors will have a brief period to offer responses to the reviews. Humans are the final decision makers in critical tasks that involve ethical and legal concerns, ranging from recidivism prediction, to medical diagnosis, to fighting against fake news. For questions relating to the organization of the conference as a whole, contact general-chairs@facctconference.org. insufficiently addressed issues in computing such as: How do algorithmic For example, if using slides, bright white slide backgrounds can make text harder to read; choose an off-white or cream background instead. publication archive. Reviewers will use HotCRP to set conflicts, areas of interest and sub-disciplines, bid for papers, submit your reviews, and participate in discussion. social, and institutional analyses. There is one key exception. A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Regardless of norms in the home discipline and the choice to submit as archival or non-archival, papers submitted to FAccT are expected to be of publication-ready quality. papers will be reviewed by experts on the topic, from disciplines as Claims are well supported by theoretical analysis, evidence, argument, and/or experimental results. The research program of ACM FAccT solicits academic work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer . ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 2022 (ACM FAccT 2023) Call For Papers. About us. Copyright 2023 ACM, Inc. FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT '21: 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Chicago , As calls for fair and unbiased algorithmic systems increase, so too does the number of individuals working on algorithmic fairness in industry. Archival and Non-archival Submissions. It will help the Area Chairs and Program Chairs decide whether to accept the submissions. There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact program-chairs@facctconference.org for any ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. Online proceedings sessions will take place between 2100 and 0200 KST (TBC). authors will be examined by PC Chairs on a case-by-case basis. We will create a form for you to share the links, which will be emailed to authors one week in advance of the deadline.The form for uploading your video is here. statistics, the humanities, and law. Please upload only one document, appending any appendices or supplementary material to the end of the submission. The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. The growing volume of digital data stimulates the adoption of recommender systems in different socioeconomic domains, including news industries. perspectives on fairness? workshop papers: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that has Aida Rahmattalabi, Phebe Vayanos, Kathryn Dullerud, and Eric Rice. Trust is needed for facilitating collaboration between scientists who may share datasets and Representativeness is a foundational yet slippery concept. Feb 22, 2021: Our paper "One Label, One Billion Faces . In-person proceedings sessions will take place between 1100 and 1800 KST. We will expand on this below. FAT* '19: Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAT* '19: Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Chicago , the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding Authors are not required or expected to submit a response. format. anonymous review process. published short papers or abstracts, even if they appeared in formal It can be tempting to only comment on the weaknesses; however, Track Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. Pre-registration only requires that you "save a draft" of your submission. In cases where the Program Chairs (PC) have concerns about A natural remedy is to remove such features from the model. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are Using inappropriate or derogatory language is not acceptable. What constitutes a "fair" allocation of the items among them? Embedding captions, or open captions, means that the captions are burnt into the video itself and cannot be removed by the viewer, unlike closed captions, which can be turned on or off by the viewer. Extensions of Your video must have *embedded* captions (see next section). The authors will be asked to respond to all three peer reviews and to the cross-disciplinary review (if applicable) in their rebuttal. It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses, however, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision.
What Happened To Eminem's Friends From 8 Mile,
Darryl Dawkins Death Cause,
Articles A
Follow me!
