Follow me!">
Tested on ASUS K40IN Ventoy Version 1.0.78 What about latest release Yes. How to suppress iso files under specific directory . Posts: 15 Threads: 4 Joined: Apr 2020 Reputation: 0 0 Well occasionally send you account related emails. Option 1: Completly by pass the secure boot like the current release. This means current is Legacy BIOS mode. Windows 10 32bit In this situation, with current Ventoy architecture, nothing will boot (even Fedora ISO), because the validation (and loading) files signed with Shim certificate requires support from the bootloader and every chainloaded .efi file (it uses custom protocol, regular EFI functions can't be used. Hope it would helps, @ventoy I still have this error on z580 with ventoy 1.0.16. I'm considering two ways for user to select option 1. So the new ISO file can be booted fine in a secure boot enviroment. The USB partition shows very slow after install Ventoy. That is to say, a WinPE.iso or ubuntu.iso file can be booted fine with secure boot enabled(even no need for the user to whitelist them) but it may contain a malicious application in it. wifislax64-2.1-final.iso - 2 GB, obarun-JWM-2020.03.01-x86_64.iso - 1.6 GB, MiniTool_Partition_Wizard_10.2.3_Technician_WinPE.iso - 350 MB, artix-cinnamon-s6-20200210-x86_64.iso - 1.88 GB, Parrot-security-4.8_x64.iso - 4.03 GB No bootfile found for UEFI with Ventoy, But OK witth rufus. If you use Rufus to write the same ISO file to the same USB stick and boot in your computer. No bootfile found for UEFI! What matters is what users perceive and expect. That would be my preference, because someone who wants to bypass Secure Boot indiscriminately, without disabling Secure Boot altogether, should have a clue what they are doing, and the problem with presenting options as a dialog is that you end up with tutorials that advise users to pick the less secure option, because whoever wrote happened to find the other choices inconvenient without giving much thought about the end result. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. Option 2: bypass secure boot In this quick video guide I will show you how to fix the error:No bootfile found for UEFI!Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!I had this problem on my . SecureBoot - Debian Wiki Hi FadeMind, the woraround for that Problem with WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso is that you must copy the SSTR to the root of yout USB drive than all apps are avalaible. always used Archive Manager to do this and have never had an issue. Ventoy can boot any wim file and inject any user code into it. Remove Ventoy secure boot key. Just some of my thoughts: @chromer030 hello. In this case you must take care about the list and make sure to select the right disk. This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. My guesd is it does not. Already on GitHub? Edit: Disabling Secure Boot didn't help. ? You can have BIOS with TPM and disk encryption and, provided your hardware manufacturer implements anti tampering protection to ensure that the TPM is not sharing data it shouldn't share with parts of the system that should not be trusted, it should be no less secure than TPM-based encryption on a Secure Boot enabled system. Ventoy 1.0.55: bypass Windows 11 requirements check during installation If you allow someone physical access to your Secure Boot-enabled system, and you have not disabled USB booting in the BIOS (or booting from CD\DVD), then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. How to mount the ISO partition in Linux after boot ? fdisk: Create a primary partition with partition type EFI (FAT-12/16/32). I'm not talking about CSM. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed executables when Secure Boot is enabled, Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements. Format XFS in Linux: sudo mkfs -t xfs /dev/sdb1, It may be related to the motherboard USB 2.0/3.0 port. That error i have also with WinPE 10 Sergei is booting with that error ( on Skylake Processor). @DocAciD I don't have a Lenovo, ThinkPad or a ThinkCentre, Getting the same on TinyCoreLiInux (CorePlus), URL; http://tinycorelinux.net/downloads.html, The ISO must be UEFI-bootable and have a UEFI64 boot file \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.EFI The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result, It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU, The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result Hiren's BootCD Linux distributives use Shim loader, each distro with it's own embedded certificate unique for each distro. Maybe the image does not suport IA32 UEFI! Just right-click on "This PC" on the desktop, select "Manage", and click on "Disk Management . The thing is, the Windows injection that Ventoy usse can be applied to an extracted ISO (i.e. However, I guess it should be possible to automatically enroll ALL needed keys to shim from grub module on the first boot (when the user enrolls my ENROLL_THIS_CERT_INTO_MOKMANAGER.crt) and handle unsigned efi binaries as a special case or just require to sign them with user-generated key? In a fit of desperation, I tried another USB drive - this one 64GB instead of 8GB. Would be nice if this could be supported in the future as well. Just create a FAT32 partition, change its label to ARCH_YYYYMM (fill in the ISO's date, now it would be ARCH_202109) and extract the Arch ISO to it. I'll see if I can find some time in the next two weeks to play with your solution, but don't hold your breath. Ventoy -Bootable USB [No-Root] - Apps on Google Play - Android Apps on Can it boot ok? They do not provide a legacy boot option if there is a fat partition with an /EFI folder on it. You can use these commands to format it: to your account, Hi ! I'll fix it. Tested Distros (Updating) I don't have a IA32 hardware device, so I normally test it in VMware. https://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php?t=4997. Yep, the Rescuezilla v2.4 thing is not a problem with Ventoy. And of course, people expect that if they run UEFIinSecureBoot or similar software, whose goal is explicitly stated as such, it will effectively remove Secure Boot. I rarely get any problems with other menu systems based on grub2\grub4dos\syslinux\isolinux, just Ventoy gives problems. I have used OSFMount to convert the img file of memtest v8 to iso but I have encountered the same issue. That's theoretically feasible but is clearly banned by the shim/MS. This means current is UEFI mode. to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5NFuDCZQ00, http://tinycorelinux.net/13.x/x86_64/release/. Ventoy2Disk.exe always failed to install ? So if the ISO doesn't support UEFI mode itself, the boot will fail. If Ventoy was intended to be used from an internal hard disk, I would agree with you, but Ventoy is a USB-based multiboot solution and therefore the user must have physical access to the system, so it is the users responsibility to be careful about what he inserts into that USB port. if this issue was addressed), it could probably be Secure Boot signed, in the same manner as UEFI:NTFS was itself Secure Boot signed. @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added ISO file: "Win10SupperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso" Option 2 will be the default option. About Secure Boot in UEFI mode - Ventoy In WIMBOOT mode (ctrl+w) I get 'Loading files. xx%' and then screen resolution changes and get nice Windows Setup GUI. For more information on how to download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, we have a guide for that. Ubuntu has shim which load only Ubuntu, etc. If everything is fine, I'll prepare the repo, prettify the code and write detailed compilation and usage instructions, as well as help @ventoy with integration. I'm hoping other people can test and report because it will most likely be a few weeks before this can make it to the top of my priority list @ventoy, are you interested in a proper implementation of Secure Boot support? Hey, I have encountered the same problem and I found that after deleting the "System Volume Information" folder on Ventoy partition of the USB disk, it can boot now. Did you test using real system and UEFI64 boot? Freebsd has some linux compatibility and also has proprietary nvidia drivers. The user has Ubuntu, Fedora and OpenSUSE ISOs which they want to load. Vmware) with UEFI mode and to confirm that the ISO file does support UEFI mode. You can reformat it with FAT32/NTFS/UDF/XFS/Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 filesystem, the only request is that Cluster Size must greater than or equal to 2048. puedes poner cualquier imagen en 32 o 64 bits Oooh, ok, I read up a bit on how PCR registers work during boot, and now it makes much more sense. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' Thank you very much for adding new ISOs and features. Oh and obviously, once that is done, Ventoy will need to make sure that it's not possible to run an older versions of it, in a Secure Boot environment where a newer version has been enrolled, as it would still defeat the whole thing. Let the user access their computer (fat chance they're going to remove the heatsink and thermal paste to see if their CPU was changed, especially if, as far as they are concerned, no change as occurred and both the computer appearance and behaviour are indistinguishable from usual). Secure Boot was supported from Ventoy 1.0.07, but the solution is not perfect enough. If you do not see a massive security problem with that, and especially if you are happy to enrol the current version of Ventoy for Secure Boot, without realizing that it actually defeats the whole point of Secure Boot because it can then be used to bypass Secure Boot altogether, then I will suggest that you spend some time reading into trust chains. Point 4 from Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements states: Code submitted for UEFI signing must not be subject to GPLv3 or any license that purports to give someone the right to demand authorization keys to be able to install modified forms of the code on a device. Personally, I don't have much of an issue with Ventoy using the current approach as a stopgap solution, as long as it is agreed that this is only a stopgap, since it comes with a huge drawback, and that a better solution (validation of that the UEFI bootloaders chain loaded from GRUB pass Secure Boot validation when Secure Boot has been enabled by the user) needs to be implemented in the long run. Now, that one can currently break the trust chain somewhere down the line, by inserting a malicious program at the first level where the trust stops being validated, which, incidentally, as a method (since I am NOT calling Ventoy malicious here) is very similar to what Ventoy is doing for Windows boot, is irrelevant to the matter, because one can very much conceive an OS that is being secured all the way (and, once again, if Microsoft were to start doing just that, then that would most likely mark the end of being able to use Ventoy with Windows ISOs since it would no longer be able to inject an executable that isn't signed by Microsoft as part of the boot process) and that validates the signature of every single binary it runs along the way which means that the trust chain needs to start somewhere and (as far as user providable binaries are concerned) that trust chain starts with Secure Boot. And for good measure, clone that encrypted disk again. Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed Windows 7 UEFI64 Install - Easy2Boot Its ok. While Ventoy is designed to boot in with secure boot enabled, if your computer does not support the secure boot feature, then an error will result. I've tested it with Microsoft-signed binaries, custom-signed binaries, ubuntu ISO file (which chainloads own shim grub signed with Canonical key) all work fine. This same image I boot regularly on VMware UEFI. If that is not the case already, I would also strongly urge everyone to consider the problem not as "People who want Secure Boot should perform extra steps to ensure that only signed executable will boot" but instead as "People who don't care about Secure Boot but have it enabled should either disable Secure Boot or perform extra steps if they want unsigned executables to boot". I think it's OK. Ventoy is able to chain boot Windows 10 (build 2004) just fine on the same systems. Yes. Discovery and usage of shim protocol of loaded shim binary for global UEFI validation functions (validation policy override with shim verification), Shim protocol unregistration of loaded shim binary (to prevent confusion among shims of multiple vendors and registration of multiple protocols which are handled by different chainloaded shims). 8 Mb. As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key, it uses Shim from Fedora (or, more precisely, from Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk). for grub modules, maybe I can pack all the modules into one grub.efi and for other efi files(e.g. Open Rufus and select the USB flash drive under "Device" and select Extended Windows 11 Installation under Image option. About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE, Ventoy2Disk.exe can't enumerate my USB device. Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. I guess this is a classic error 45, huh? all give ERROR on HP Laptop : VMware or VirtualBox) This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. The easiest thing to do if you don't have a UEFI-bootable Memtest86 ISO is to extract the \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.efi file and just copy that to your Ventoy drive. unsigned kernel still can not be booted. No. Download ventoy-delete-key-1..iso and copy it to the Ventoy USB drive. Already on GitHub? size 5580453888 bytes (5,58 GB) GRUB mode fixed it! I hope there will be no issues in this adoption. And IMO, anything that attempts to push the idea that, maybe, allowing silent boot of unsigned bootloaders is not that bad, is actually doing a major disservice to users, as it does weaken the security of their system and, if this is really what a user wants, they can and should disable Secure Boot. Cantt load some ISOs - Ventoy Some modern systems are not compatible with Windows 7 UEFI64 (may hang) 4 Ways to Fix Ventoy if It's Not Working [Booting Issues] I would say that it probably makes sense to first see what LoadImage()/StarImage() let through in an SB enabled environment (provided that this is what Ventoy/GRUB uses behind the scenes, which I'm not too sure about), and then decide if it's worth/possible to let users choose to run unsigned bootloaders. Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. If someone has physical access to a system and that system is enabled to boot from a USB drive, then all they need to do is boot to an OS such as Ubuntu or WindowsPE or WindowsToGo from that USB drive (these OS's are all signed and so will Secure boot). 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. Fix PC issues and remove viruses now in 3 easy steps: download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, Brother Printer Paper Jam: How to Easily Clear It, Fix Missing Dll Files in Windows 10 & Learn what Causes that. An encoding issue, perhaps (for the text)? Of course , Added. Yeah, I think UEFI LoadImage()/StarImage(), which is what you'd call to chain load the UEFI bootloader, are set to validate the loaded image for Secure Boot and not launch it for unsigned/broken images, if Secure Boot is enabled (but I admit I haven't formally validated that). After installation, simply click the Start Scan button and then press on Repair All. These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. This software will repair common computer errors, protect you from file loss, malware, hardware failure and optimize your PC for maximum performance. Can I reformat the 1st (bigger) partition ? I didn't expect this folder to be an issue. My guesd is it does not. ^^ maybe a lenovo / thinkpad / thinkcentre issue ? SB works using cryptographic checksums and signatures. You can repair the drive or replace it. @pbatard Sorry, I should have explained my position clearer - I fully agree that the Secure Boot bypass Ventoy uses is not secure, and I'm not using Ventoy exactly because of it. Ventoy Then your life is simplified to Persistence management while each of the 2 (Ventoy or SG2D) provide the ability to boot Windows if it is installed on any local . TPM encryption has historically been independent of Secure Boot. 1.- comprobar que la imagen que tienes sea de 64 bits Ventoy Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI So by default, you need to disabled secure boot in BIOS before boot Ventoy in UEFI mode. 6. your point) and you also want them to actually do their designated job, including letting you know, if you have Secure Boot enabled, when some third party UEFI boot loader didn't pass Secure Boot validation, even if that boot loader will only ever be run from someone who has to have physical access to your computer in the first place. This solution is only for Legacy BIOS, not UEFI. Some questions about using KLV-Airedale - Page 4 - Puppy Linux Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. For these who select to bypass secure boot. boots, but kernel panic: did not find boot partitions; opens a debugger. Thank you! 2. Feedback is welcome If your tested hardware or image file is not listed here, please tell me and I will be glad to add it to the table here. So, yeah, if you have access to to the hardware, then Secure Boot, TPM or whatever security measure you currently have on consumer-grade products, is pretty much useless because, as long as you can swap hardware components around, or even touch the hardware (to glitch the RAM for instance), then unless the TPM comes with an X-Ray machine that can scan and compare hardware components, you're going to have a very hard time plugging all the many holes through which a dedicated attacker can gain access to your data. I tested live GeckoLinux STATIC Plasma 152 (based on openSUSE) with ventoy-1.0.15. If the ISO file name is too long to displayed completely. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view, https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file, [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1. All the userspace applications don't need to be signed. I'm getting the same error when booting "Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso" or "pop-os_20.04_amd64_intel_8.iso" on either a new ThinkPad X13 or T14s using Ventoy 1.0.31 UEFI. I was just objecting to your claim that Secure Boot is useless when someone has physical access to the device, which I don't think is true, as it is still (afaik) required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso BOOT but Custom launcher cannot open custom path and unable access to special apps. see http://tinycorelinux.net/13.x/x86_64/release/ In that case there's no difference in booting from USB or plugging in a SATA or NVMe drive with the same content as you'd put on USB (and we can debate about intrusion detection if you want). This ISO file doesn't change the secure boot policy. ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi If it fails to do that, then you have created a major security problem, no matter how you look at it. Some Legacy BIOS has an access limitation and wont read a disk that exceeds the limitation. But unless it exploits a Secure Boot vulnerability or limitation (or you get cozy with the folks controlling shim keys), that bootloader should require to be enrolled to pass Secure Boot validation, in the same manner as Ventoy does it. For instance, if you produce digitally signed software for Windows, to ensure that your users can validate that when they run an application, they can tell with certainty whether it comes from you or not, you really don't want someone to install software on the user computer that will suddenly make applications that weren't signed by you look as if they were signed by you. It's a pain in the ass to do yes, but I wouldn't qualify it as very hard. Error description By the way, since I do want to bring that message home for people who might be tempted to place a bit too much trust in TPMs, disk encryption and Secure Boot, what the NSA would most likely do, if they wanted to access your encrypted disk data on an x86 PC, is issue a secret executive order to Intel or AMD, to design special version of the CPU they need, where the serial can be altered programmatically (so that they can clone the serial from the original CPU in case the TPM checks it) and that includes additional logic and EPROM to detect and store the critical data (such as disk decryption keys) when accessed. UEFi64? They all work if I put them onto flash drives directly with Rufus. Win10UEFI There are many kinds of WinPE. I see your point, this CorePlus ISO is indeed missing that EFI file. I didn't add an efi boot file - it already existed; I only referenced Is there any progress about secure boot support? Maybe the image does not support x64 uefi . Will there be any? Ventoy is an open source tool to create a bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI files. @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? It was actually quite the struggle to get to that stage (expensive too!) can u test ? For example, how to get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. but CorePure64-13.1.iso does not as it does not contain any EFI boot files. screenshots if possible Time-saving software and hardware expertise that helps 200M users yearly. 5. extservice Currently there is only a Secure boot support option for check. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. For example, GRUB 2 is licensed under GPLv3 and will not be signed. https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250 Have a question about this project? ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefidibujo del sistema nervioso y sus partes para nios ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. Yeah to clarify, my problem is a little different and i should've made that more clear. That's because, if they did want to boot non Secure Boot enabled ones, they would disable Secure Boot themselves. So as @pbatard said, the secure boot solution is a stopgap and that's why Ventoy is still at 1.0.XX. sol-11_3-live-x86.iso | 1.22 GB, gnewsense-live-4.0-amd64-gnome.iso | 1.10 GB, hyperbola-milky-way-v0.3.1-dual.iso | 680 MB, kibojoe-17.09final-stable-x86_64-code21217.iso | 950 MB, uruk-gnu-linux-3.0-2020-6-alpha-1.iso | 1.35 GB, Redcore.Linux.Hardened.2004.KDE.amd64.iso | 3.5 GB, Drauger_OS-7.5.1-beta2-AMD64.iso | 1.8 GB, MagpieOS-Gnome-2.4-Eva-2018.10.01-x86_64.iso | 2.3 GB, kaisenlinuxrolling1.0-amd64.iso | 2.80 GB, chakra-2019.09.26-a022cb57-x86_64.iso | 2.7 GB, Regata_OS_19.1_en-US.x86_64-19.1.50.iso | 2.4 GB. Now that Ventoy is installed on your USB drive, you can create a bootable USB drive by simply copying some ISO files onto the USB, no matter if they are Linux distribution ISOs or Windows 10 / 8 / 7 ISO files. Although it could be disabled on all typical motherboards in UEFI setup menu, sometimes it's not easily possible e.g. I really fail to fathom how people here are disputing that if someone agrees to enroll Ventoy in a Secure Boot environment, it only means that they agree to trust the Ventoy application, and not that they grant it the right to just run whatever bootloader anybody will now be able to throw at their computer through Ventoy (which may very well be a malicious bootloader ran by someone who is not the owner of that computer but who knows or hopes that the user enrolled Ventoy).
Archangels Vs Greek Gods,
The Gloaming Who Killed Jenny,
How Do I Anonymously Report Someone To Immigration,
Articles V
Follow me!
